Legal Opinion
Idaho Mutual Benefit Ass'n v. Robison
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided December 15, 1944No. 7166PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGivens, J.
The Industrial Accident Board had apparently indicated it would require appellant to pay unemployment compensation premiums on certain of its agents. Appellant, not being acquiescent, instituted the present suit under the declaratory judgment law asking the court to construe the unemployment compensation statute (Chap. 12, Third Extraordinary Session of 1935, as amended by Chapters 9, 183, 187, and 188 of the 1937 Sess. Laws; Chaps. 202, 203, and 239, 1939 Sess. Laws; Chaps. 65, 175, and 182, 1941 Sess. Laws; Chaps.' 29, 68, 92, 1943 Sess. Laws) and attacking the same. A demurrer was…
2Cases cited80 opinions
- Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Warren v. Indiana Telephone Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1940
- In Re the Claim of MortonNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- McNeil v. Panhandle Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1921
- Hodges v. DawdySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- George W. Watkins Family v. MessengerIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
- Keenan v. PriceIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
- Saint Luke's Hospital v. Labor Relations CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Engelking v. Investment BoardIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
- Higer v. HansenIdaho Supreme Court · 1946
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.