Legal Opinion
Cassidy v. Rose
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 7, 1925No. 14738PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMason, J.
This action was commenced in the district court of Oklahoma county, Okla., on May 26, 1922, by the plaintiffs in error, Carl Cassidy, J. M. Huffington, J. T. Holly, U. S. Braswell, W. W. Riley, J. H. Cunningham, J. T. Broyles, M. P. Jones, and J. H. Ring, as plaintiffs, against the defendants in error, George L. Rose, T. T. Eason, and O. E. Maple, as defendants, to recover damages for an alleged breach of a contract. The parties will hereafter be referred to a they appeared in the trial court.
It appears from the plaintiffs’ petition that they and the defendant O. E. Maple were individual…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- C. E. Sharp Lumber Co. v. Kansas Ice Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Checotah Hardware Co. v. HensleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Smith v. Oklahoma Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Sumner-May Hardware Co. v. ScallySupreme Court of Florida · 1913
3Cited by5 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Ada v. ElamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Gaines v. Gaines Bros. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Owens v. LynchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Commercial Casualty Ins. Co. v. Town of BreckenridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Standard Brick Co. v. Venetian Brick Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932