Legal Opinion
Milford-Bennington RR v Pan Am Railways
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided December 16, 2011No. CV-10-2640BPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Milford-Bennington RR v Pan Am Railways CV-10-2640B 12/16/11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Milford-Bennington Railroad Co., Inc. & Peter Leishman v. Case N o . 10-cv-00264-PB Opinion N o .
2011 DNH 206
Pan Am Railways, Inc., et a l . MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Milford-Bennington Railroad Co., Inc. (“MBR”) alleges that Pan Am Railways, Inc. (“Pan Am”) violated its implied contractual duty of good faith and fair dealing when it excluded MBR’s employee, Peter Leishman, from operating on its tracks. Pan Am has filed a motion for summary judgment, and for the reasons set…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wardair Canada Inc. v. Florida Department of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Centronics Corp. v. Genicom Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
- United States v. Victor Essil QuinnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Hobin v. Coldwell Banker Residential Affiliates, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
- Town of Peterborough v. MacDowell Colony, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
3Cited by5 opinions
- Farion N. Brown and Donna Brown v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage A/K/A Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., and Federal National Mortgage AssociationDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2016
- Rouleau v US Bank NA et alDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2015
- Dover v The Bank of NY MellonDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2016
- Julius v Wells FargoDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2017
- Todd v. Aggregate IndustriesDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2015