Legal Opinion
Hobin v. Coldwell Banker Residential Affiliates, Inc.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided January 31, 2000No. 97-877PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HORTON, j.
The plaintiff, Ross T. Hobin, the owner of a Coldwell Banker franchise, appeals from an order of the Superior Court 0Gray, J.) dismissing his claims against the defendant, Coldwell Banker Residential Affiliates, Inc. (Coldwell Banker), relating to Coldwell Banker’s alleged placement of additional franchises in Hobin’s territory. The trial court dismissed the claims of breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, breach of contract, misrepresentation, and violation of New Hampshire’s Consumer Protection Act, RSA ch. 358-A (1995 & Supp. 1998), for failure to state a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Carma Developers (California), Inc. v. Marathon Development California, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1992
- Barrows v. BolesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
- Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
- Banco Do Brasil, S.A. v. Latian, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1991
- Third Story Music, Inc. v. WaitsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Beane v. Dana S. Beane & Co., P.C.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- Estate of Ireland v. Worcester InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- In Re ScottSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- Contour Design Inc v. Chance Mold Steel Company LtdCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- Guglielmo v. WorldCom, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.