Legal Opinion

In Re Hancock

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 9, 1977No. Crim. 8552PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROWN (Gerald), P. J.

In this proceeding in habeas corpus, Jerry Wayne Hancock claims his sentencing lacks the appearance of fairness and seeks to be resentenced by a judge whose impartiality and fairness toward him cannot reasonably be questioned. We conclude such relief should be afforded.

The facts are not in dispute. Hancock had pleaded guilty to one count of first degree burglary and was awaiting sentencing when the following events occurred:

The deputy district attorney assigned to the case learned which judge had been assigned to sentence Hancock and became concerned since he…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Offutt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. In Re SwainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. In Re CalhounCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. In Re WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Robert Alton Harris v. Daniel Vasquez, Warden of California State Prison at San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. In Re MossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. In Re SpearsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. People v. AxtellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. Karis v. VasquezDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API