Legal Opinion

Furr v. Chapman

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided June 6, 1926No. 826-4520PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

. NICKELS, J.

The commissioner of insur-

ance and banking sued H. B. Purr to enforce alleged liability of a stockholder in a defunct state bank in respect to 81 shares—par value, $100 per share. Judgment for $6,544 (representing par amount of 61 shares and interest) was allowed by the district court, but recovery as to 20 shares (claimed to be held by Purr as trustee for his infant son) was denied. The judgment was rendered upon a verdict peremptorily instructed; a peremptory instruction in favor of Purr having been duly requested and refused. Upon Purr’s appeal and the commissioner’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Williams v. VreelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Washer v. SmyerTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Mathis v. Pridham, ReceiverCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1892
  4. Thompson v. First State Bank of AmarilloTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Turner v. Cattleman's Trust Co. of Ft. WorthTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pacific American Gasoline Co. of Texas v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  2. St. Regis Candies, Inc. v. HovasTexas Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Musselman v. Jasgur (In Re Seminole Walls & Ceilings Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2011
  4. Austin v. GambleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  5. Shaw v. HaileyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API