Legal Opinion

Lundquist v. Kennecott Copper Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1973No. 13271PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALLISTER, Chief Justice:

Plaintiff, motorist, initiated this action to recover damages for the personal injuries he sustained in a collision with a train operated by the defendants. Defendants, on the basis of the pleadings and depositions, moved for summary judgment, which the trial court granted. Plaintiff appeals therefrom, urging that the trial court erred in finding him contributorily negligent as a matter of law.

Plaintiff, who resided in Murray, Utah, was returning to his home from Tooele on April 1, 1970, at approximately 7 o’clock in the evening. Due to plaintiff’s unfamiliarity with…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pippy v. Oregon Short Line R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Steele v. Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Benson v. Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1955
  4. D. H. Peery Estate v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gleave v. Denver & Rio Grande Western RailroadCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988
  2. Carter v. Utah Power & Light Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Carter v. Utah Power & Light Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API