Legal Opinion · Dissent

Carter v. Utah Power & Light Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 1990No. 870340Published

1DissentStewart, Justice

I dissent because I believe that the majority opinion departs from basic legal principles and allows destruction of important privacy interests of litigants and witnesses who are subjected to pretrial discovery measures.

*1101One who testifies on deposition is often subjected to a wide-ranging inquiry into a variety of highly private matters. Parties and witnesses in a lawsuit can be required to testify as to the most intimate details and activities of their lives. In divorce and custody cases, for example, the most prevalent type of civil litigation in our courts, litigants and witnesses may be…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Gannett Co. v. DePasqualeSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Littlejohn v. BIC Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  4. Newman v. GraddickCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  5. Barbara D. Wilson v. American Motors Corp., Jean DeckerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API