Legal Opinion

Hillman v. Shannahan

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1871PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Multuomah County. The facts are stated, in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Prim, 0. J.:

The bond upon which this action is predicated was entered into between appellants and one Tileston, the assignor of respondent. Shannahan, one of the appellants, was in partnership with respondent in a music and picture store in the city of Portland, and sold out his interest in the concern to one Tileston. On the same day the appellants jointly executed to said Tileston a bond in the sum of $500 liquidated damages, to be paid to Tileston in case Shannahan should at any time within five years thereafter engage in the music and picture business in said city of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. Providence Washington InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  2. Butler v. New York & Erie Rail RoadNew York Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Coleman v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1860

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Smith, Bell & Hauck, Inc. v. CullinsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1962
  2. Sickles v. LaumanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
  3. Bennett v. Carmichael Produce Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. Trower v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Ensor v. WEHLANDCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API