Smith, Bell & Hauck, Inc. v. Cullins
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtHolden, J.
The plaintiff corporation purchased an insurance agency which was owned and operated by the defendant Cullins’ former employer. By this action in equity it seeks to enforce the employee’s covenant that he would not engage in the insurance business in the county of Chittenden for a period of three years after the termination of his employment. Equitable relief was denied and .the plaintiff appeals.
The essential facts determined by the chancellor are not in serious dispute. During the latter part of 1949, the defendant Philip G. Cullins became employed by the corporate insurance firm of Smith,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Arkansas Valley Smelting Co. v. Belden Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Paige v. . FaureNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Portuguese-American Bank of San Francisco v. WellesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Torrington Creamery, Inc. v. DavenportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Dyar Sales & MacHinery Co. v. BleilerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Hess v. Gebhard & Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Aon Consulting v. Midlands FinancialNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
- Traffic Control Services, Inc. v. United Rentals Northwest, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2004
- Sisco v. Empiregas, Inc. of Belle MinaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
- Mail-Well Envelope Company v. SaleyOregon Supreme Court · 1972
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.