Legal Opinion

Sickles v. Lauman

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 14, 1918PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from Buena Vista District Cou/rt. — James DeLand, Judge. Action for equitable relief. Petition dismissed, and plaintiff appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

For a considerable period prior to the transaction hereinafter mentioned, the defendant, J. W. Lauman, was the owner and proprietor of an established business, conducting and carrying on a laundry and the work of cleaning and pressing clothes, also the business of maintaining a station for the buying and shipping of cream. On May 29, 1916, defendant entered into a written contract with one Olive I. Wright, for the sale and transfer to the latter of the business aforesaid, together with the machinery, fixtures, and equipment of every kind and character used in connection therewith, and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Diamond Match Co. v. . RoeberNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Guerand v. DandeletCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1870
  3. Didlake v. Roden Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  4. Francisco v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  5. Hedge, Elliott & Co. v. LoweSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Curtis 1000, Inc. v. YoungbladeDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1995
  2. J. L. Davis, Inc. v. ChristopherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  3. Oak Cliff Ice Delivery Co. v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. Uptown Food Store, Inc. v. GinsbergSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
  5. Jenson v. OlsonMontana Supreme Court · 1964

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API