Legal Opinion

Rupchak v. Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 16, 1947No. Appeal, 58PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

Disability overtook claimant in the course of his employment. The question is: Does the record sustain the specific finding of the referee, affirmed by the board, that his disability resulted from accidental injury on October 19, 1943. Judgment was entered on an award of compensation for partial disability.

The lower court was unable to agree with the board that there was evidence of an accident in the ordinary sense of a fortuitous, unforeseen event, causing an injury. But it did find that claimant’s disability was an unusual effect of a known cause and therefore…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Vorbnoff v. Mesta Machine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Adamchick v. Wyoming Valley Collieries Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Good v. Pennsylvania Department of Property & SuppliesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  4. Apker v. Crown Can Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. Garver v. B. K. Elliott Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Landis v. General Motors Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Hurlburt v. Fidelity Window Cleaning Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Yuhas v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. A. P. Green Refractories Co. v. LuckeyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Rosso v. Aetna Steel Products Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API