Legal Opinion

In Re Parmalat Securities Litigation

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 9, 2006No. 04 MD 1653(LAK)PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

KAPLAN, District Judge.

The plaintiffs in these consolidated class actions were investors in the securities of the international dairy conglomerate Parmalat Finanziaria S.p.A. and its subsidiaries and affiliates (collectively “Parmalat”). 1 They seek recovery from Parmalat’s officers, directors, accountants, lawyers, and banks under Sections 10(b) 2 and 20(a) 3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Rule 10b-5 4 thereunder.

In an opinion dated July 13, 2005 {“Parmalat IIP’), this Court dismissed the First Amended Complaint (the “FAC”) to the extent it…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Robertson-Ceco Corp., United Dominion Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. In Re Scottish Re Group Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
  2. Lapin v. Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
  3. In Re Citigroup Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  4. Special Situations Fund III QP, L.P. v. Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu CPA, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  5. Public Pension Fund Group v. KV PHARMACEUTICAL CO.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API