Legal Opinion

Langley v. Ashe

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1893No. 4804PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from the district court of Colfax county. Tried below before Post, J.' 1 High, Injunctions [2d ed.], secs. 125, 126, and cases cited; 7 Lawson, Rights, Rem. & Pr., 3702, and cases cited; Scofield v. State Ncetional Bank of Lincoln, 9 Neb., 316; Young v. Morgan, 9 Neb., 169.

1Opinion of the Court

Ragan, C.

Bernard Ashe sued Charles Cooper and James Langley before a justice of the peace in Colfax county, on a promissory note. The summons was made returnable January 23, 1889, and was duly served. On January 21 Ashe and Cooper appeared before the justice and he, by their consent, continued the case until March 1, 1889. Langley made no appearance whatever in the case, and had no knowledge of this continuance. On March 1, 1889, the justice rendered judgment against Cooper and Langley on said note. April 18, 1889, an execution was issued and placed in the hands of the sheriff, who levied…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Janes v. HowellNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Scofield v. State National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bankers Life Insurance v. RobbinsNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Commercial Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Holly Development, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Losey v. NeidigNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Cleland v. Hamilton Loan & Trust Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Pilger v. TorrenceNebraska Supreme Court · 1894

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API