Gray v. Hercules Powder Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1DissentHoch, J.
Although it fell to my lot to write the opinion for the court in this case I cannot concur. In my opinion the decision gives an unsound construction to the workmen’s compensation act and one which is not required by any of the decisions cited in its support. The result portends grave injustice to both employers and employees.
The decision is predicated upon our repeated holding that the workmen’s compensation act is complete in itself and that the procedure to be followed is to be found in the act and is not to be supplemented by borrowing rules from the code of civil procedure. I have no…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. MatlockSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
- State Ex Rel. Andrews v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1931
- State Ex Rel. Gentry v. BeckerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
- In re MillingtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
- Rasing v. HealzerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.