Legal Opinion
National Ass'n of Postmasters of the United States v. Hyatt Regency Washington
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 16, 2006No. 04-CV-1112, 04-CV-1343PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FISHER, Associate Judge:
In this contract dispute, the National Association of Postmasters of the United States (NAPUS) and Hyatt Regency Washington (Hyatt) each sought summary judgment in relation to the cancellation of two NAPUS conferences to be held at Hyatt. The trial court granted judgment for Hyatt, holding that NAPUS was not permitted to cancel the conferences without paying liquidated damages because it had not given notice within the time limits established by the contract. We affirm the trial court’s ruling, on alternative grounds, and uphold the award of attorneys’ fees. Because…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Holland v. HannanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Transatlantic Financing Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
- In re J.D.C.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Duffy v. DuffyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Edwards v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- EastBanc, Inc. v. Georgetown Park Associates II, L.P.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- McFarland v. George Washington UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Daniel Logan v. LaSalle Bank National AssociationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Chamberlain v. American Honda Finance Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Tucci v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.