Legal Opinion
Chamberlain v. American Honda Finance Corp.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 2, 2007No. 05-CV-755PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FISHER, Associate Judge:
Appellants Daniel Chamberlain and Lisa and Earl Hicks claim that appellee American Honda Finance Corporation (“AHFC”) violated the District of Columbia Municipal Regulations and the Consumer Protection Procedures Act after it repossessed their automobiles. The trial court concluded that Maryland law applied and dismissed the amended complaint for failure to state a claim because it only cited District of Columbia statutes and regulations as a basis for relief. Appellants contend that the trial court erred by (1) applying Maryland law and (2) relying on material outside…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
- Venture Associates Corporation, a Tennessee Corporation v. Zenith Data Systems Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Jacqueline P. Taylor v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Ricki Helfer, Chairman, FdicCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Peoples Drug Stores, Inc. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Grayson v. AT & T CORP.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Murray v. Wells Fargo Home MortgageDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Michael Francis and Queue, LLC v. Munir Rehman and HAK, LLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- Daniel Logan v. LaSalle Bank National AssociationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Williams v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.