Legal Opinion
David Manning v. The State of California
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 15, 1967No. 21484PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
The appeal of petitioner below from the order denying petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is affirmed, on the order of the District Court, and for the reasons expressed therein. We adopt it in toto:
“Petitioner, a state prisoner confined at San Quentin, has made application to this Court for a writ of habeas corpus. An order to show cause why the petitioner should not be released was issued on August 31, 1965. Following the hearing on the order to show cause, the case was set down for an evidentiary hearing and the Court appointed Thomas C. Ryan, Esq., to represent petitioner. The evidentiary…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Carrizosa v. WilsonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1965
3Cited by7 opinions
- Emil Schoepflin and William Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Ronnie Arnold v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- Wayne L. Stout v. Hoyt C. Cupp, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Helen Carolyn Dayton v. Clarence T. Gladden, Warden, Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Douglas W. Hall v. Louis S. Nelson, Warden, California State Prison, Tamal, CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.