Legal Opinion

Douglas W. Hall v. Louis S. Nelson, Warden, California State Prison, Tamal, California

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 7, 1969No. 22603PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The United States district court has denied Hall’s petition for a writ of ha-beas corpus. He appeals.

Hall pleaded guilty to a state., charge of robbing a grocery store. Under such circumstances, the grounds now possible in a federal court are limited. Doran v. Wilson, 9 Cir., 369 F.2d 505, upon which petitioner relies is quite different. In that case there was a claim that his confession was made under the heavy influence of narcotics. This, he said, induced his plea. Here Hall relies on the fact that he made a confession which was never known to the public defender who advised to plead…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Leopold Joseph Doran v. Lawrence E. Wilson, Warden, San Quentin PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  4. David Manning v. The State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Donovan v. DelgadoDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1971
  2. United States v. Charles Louis EverettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API