Legal Opinion
Emil Schoepflin and William Smith v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 2, 1968No. 19992_1PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMLEY, Circuit Judge:
Emil Schoepflin and William Smith appeal from their conviction, following a joint jury trial, of robbing a federally-insured bank in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) (1964).
On November 19, 1964, at approximately 8:25 a. m., the Fulton-Fair Oaks Branch of the Bank of America in Sacramento, California, was robbed by two men wearing nylon stockings over their heads. Smith was arrested at his apartment in a duplex early the following morning. Part of the stolen bank money and a nylon stocking were found on the premises. Schoepflin was not apprehended until two months later…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Harper v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1970
- United States v. Donald Anderson and Jack SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- State v. WitherspoonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
- The United States v. Michael Bazinet, the United States v. George KnoxCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.