Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Garton Toy Co. v. Town of Mosel

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1966PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.

The issue is: Were the assessments of the Garton Toy Company property in the town of Mosel by the assessors as corrected by the board of review made on the basis permitted by the statutes.

Sec. 70.32, Stats., provides:

“Real estate, how valued. (1) Real property shall be valued by the assessor from actual view or from the best information that the assessor can practicably obtain, at the full value which could ordinarily be obtained therefor at private sale. . . .”

Sec. 70.34, Stats., provides:

“Personalty. All articles of personal property shall, as far as practicable, be valued by the assessor…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. International Business Machines Corp. v. Board of ReviewWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  2. State Ex Rel. Enterprise Realty Co. v. SwiderskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Madison Aerie No. 623 Fraternal Order of Eagles, Inc. v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Central Cheese Co. v. City of MarshfieldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  5. State Ex Rel. Kenosha Office Building Co. v. HerrmannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Nankin v. Village of ShorewoodWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Rosen v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State Ex Rel. Markarian v. City of CudahyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Waste Management of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Kenosha County Board of ReviewWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State Ex Rel. Geipel v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API