Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Markarian v. City of Cudahy

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1970No. 53PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, C. J.

The city claims there was credible evidence by the assessor which reasonably supports the assessment and the board of review did not act arbitrarily, in bad faith or dishonestly, or refuse to consider competent, substantial evidence presented by Markarian because most of his testimony was hearsay. There is no question the board of review did not act arbitrarily or in bad faith or dishonestly. But there is an issue of whether the board refused to consider competent evidence presented by Markarian and whether the method of evaluation used by the assessor was correct. The trial court based its…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. WeiherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  2. State Ex Rel. Boostrom v. Board of ReviewWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  3. State ex rel. Evansville Mercantile Ass'n v. City of EvansvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  4. State Ex Rel. Enterprise Realty Co. v. SwiderskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  5. State Ex Rel. Baker Manufacturing Co. v. City of EvansvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Adams Outdoor Advertising, Ltd. v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Rosen v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Waste Management of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Kenosha County Board of ReviewWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State Ex Rel. Geipel v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State Ex Rel. Mitchell Aero, Inc. v. Board of ReviewWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API