Legal Opinion

Williams v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 15, 1977No. 37849PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GUNN, Judge.

Movant appeals from a denial of his Rule 27.26 motion to vacate the 25 year sentence imposed upon him after conviction for assault with intent to kill. Movant’s appeal raises four points of alleged error, none of which is meritorious.

Movant first argues that the conviction and sentencing under the charge of assault with intent to kill with malice aforethought, a felony under § 559.180 RSMo. 1969,1 instead of attempted murder, deprives him of equal protection of the laws. Movant reasons that the charge of assault with intent to kill with malice aforethought carries a range of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Turnbough v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Bibee v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Lee v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. State v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Trice v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hanson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Ross v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Williams v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Hampton v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Royal v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API