Ross v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
TITUS, Presiding Judge.
Movant, then defendant, was convicted by a Mississippi County jury (after a change of venue from New Madrid County) of assault with intent to kill with malice aforethought (§ 559.180, RSMo 1969) and armed robbery (§ 560.135, RSMo 1969). The convictions were affirmed upon appeal. State v. Ross, 523 S.W.2d 841 (Mo.App. 1975).
Thereafter, and pursuant to Rule 27.26, V.A.M.R., movant, as an indigent prisoner, filed a pro se motion to set aside the convictions, supra, and the sentences imposed thereon. In accordance with Rule 27.26(h), V.A.M.R., the court nisi appointed…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Fields v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
- State v. WrightSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
- Hemphill v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
- Haliburton v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Riley v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- Arnold v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
- Spencer v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
- Chastain v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- Joyce v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.