Cingota v. Milliken
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
SPAETH, Judge:
This is a personal injury case. Appellant, who was the plaintiff below, argues that the lower court erred in charging the jury that it could not return a verdict for her if it found that her injury was an aggravation of a pre-existing condition. We agree and shall therefore reverse and remand for a new trial. 1
On January 26, 1976, appellant sustained injuries when she fell down a flight .of four steps in an apartment building in Pittsburgh owned by appellee. Appellant was on the premises visiting a friend who was a tenant in the building. In her complaint, appellant described…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Otto v. American Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Littman v. Bell Tel. Co. of Pa.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Offensend v. Atlantic Refining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Lebesco v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Behrend v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ecksel v. Orleans Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Holland v. ZelnickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Sands v. ForrestSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Rivera v. Philadelphia Theological Seminary of St. Charles Borromeo, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Small v. Columbia Gas of Pennsylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.