Legal Opinion

Cingota v. Milliken

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 10, 1981No. 420PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPAETH, Judge:

This is a personal injury case. Appellant, who was the plaintiff below, argues that the lower court erred in charging the jury that it could not return a verdict for her if it found that her injury was an aggravation of a pre-existing condition. We agree and shall therefore reverse and remand for a new trial. 1

On January 26, 1976, appellant sustained injuries when she fell down a flight .of four steps in an apartment building in Pittsburgh owned by appellee. Appellant was on the premises visiting a friend who was a tenant in the building. In her complaint, appellant described…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Otto v. American Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Littman v. Bell Tel. Co. of Pa.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Offensend v. Atlantic Refining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Lebesco v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Behrend v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ecksel v. Orleans Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Holland v. ZelnickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Sands v. ForrestSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Rivera v. Philadelphia Theological Seminary of St. Charles Borromeo, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Small v. Columbia Gas of Pennsylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API