Legal Opinion
Freese v. Federal Deposit Insurance
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided November 24, 1993No. C-93-386-LPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LOUGHLIN, Senior District Judge.
Before the court is the defendant’s Motion for Summary Enforcement of Administrative Subpoena and Motion to Dismiss. For the reasons outlined below, the motion is denied.
Background
On October 10, 1991, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) was appointed receiver and liquidating agent for New Hampshire Savings Bank. On September 18, 1992, the FDIC issued an Order of Investigation. The purpose of the investiga'tion was to determine whether any valid claims existed against the Bank’s former officers and directors; whether sufficient assets existed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Federal Trade Commission v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,346 Securities and Exchange Commission, Applicant-Appellee v. Robert HowattCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Stephen B. ComleyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Federal Trade Commission v. Glenn W. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. GreifDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1995
- Lopes v. Resolution Trust Corp.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1994
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. GreifDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1995