Legal Opinion

United States v. Stephen B. Comley

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided November 29, 1989No. 89-1680PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOWNES, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the district court enforcing an administrative subpoena served on appellant Stephen B. Comley by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (“NRC” or “Commission”). The subpoena seeks tape recordings or transcripts prepared by Comley of telephone conversations between Comley and an NRC employee who is the subject of an NRC investigation. Comley challenges the Commission’s authority to issue the subpoena and also contends that the subpoena violates his first amendment right to freedom of association. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Bates v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Brown v. Socialist Workers '74 Campaign Comm. (Ohio)Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Jorge Correa-Martinez v. Rene Arrillaga-BelendezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  2. Sutliffe v. Epping School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  3. United States v. Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  4. In Re Motor Fuel Temperature Sales Practices LitigationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2010
  5. Solers, Inc. v. DoeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API