Legal Opinion

Louisville, Evansville & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Caldwell

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1884No. 11,161PublishedCited by 13 opinions

From the Vanderburgh Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

The first error complained of by the appellant, the defendant below, is the overruling of its demurrer to appellee’s complaint in this cause.

In his complaint the appellee, Caldwell, alleged that, on the 15th day of October, 1882, at Evansville, Indiana, JamesDonigan and Horace Conkey, for a sufficient consideration, drew their bill of exchange or order, directed to the Louisville, New Albany and St. Louis Railway Company, under the name of St. John Boyle, its vice-president, requiring the said railway company, by its said vice-president, to pay to the appellee $1,000, at sight; that, prior to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jackson School Township v. FarlowIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. McDill v. GunnIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Kenyon v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  4. Vater v. LewisIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Crim v. FitchIndiana Supreme Court · 1876

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Wolke v. FlemingIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Second National Bank v. Midland Steel Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Deeter v. BurkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. Magic Packing Co. v. Stone-Ordean Wells Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Adams Express Co. v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1903

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API