State v. Hannagan
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before BOOCHEVER, C. J., and RABI-NOWITZ, CONNOR, ERWIN and BURKE, JJ. BOOCHEVER, Chief Justice.
The State of Alaska appeals from the decision of the trial court rendered on a Criminal Rule 35(b) post-conviction relief proceeding. This appeal raises the initial procedural question of the state’s right to appeal from post-conviction relief proceedings, as well as the substantive issue of the defendant’s right to be present during the playback of trial testimony to the jury. We hold that the state may appeal a Criminal Rule 35(b) post-conviction relief determination. We further hold that…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Hopt v. People of Territory of UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Braham v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- Coleman v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1981
- Hensel v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Seeley v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.