Legal Opinion
Tamerlane Corp. v. Warwick Insurance
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided April 21, 1992PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAbrams, J.
At issue is whether, in an insurance cancellation case, the day notice is received is counted in determining the date that the policy is cancelled. The plaintiffs brought an action against Warwick Insurance Company (Warwick) to enforce a “multi-peril,” commercial casualty insurance policy (policy) issued by Warwick. In their complaint, the plaintiffs assert that the policy was in effect when a fire damaged the insured premises. They claim that Warwick wrongfully failed to reimburse them for their loss and defend them in litigation arising out of the fire. The plaintiffs sought damages under…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Wellesley College v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Diaz v. Eli Lilly & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. BlakelyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Johnson Controls, Inc. v. BowesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Royal-Globe Insurance v. CravenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- MacCormack v. Boston Edison Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- Commonwealth v. WoodsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- Champigny v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- Papadopoulos v. Target CorporationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
- Shirley Wayside Ltd. Partnership v. Board of Appeals of ShirleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.