Legal Opinion
Akzo v. International Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided December 22, 1986No. 86-877PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
808 F.2d 1471
8 ITRD 1673, 55 USLW 2399, 1987-1 Trade
Cases 67,529,
1 U.S.P.Q.2d 1241, 5 Fed. Cir. (T) 52
AKZO N.V., Enka B.V., Aramide Maatschappij v.o.f. and Akzona
Incorporated, Appellants,
v.
U.S. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee,
E.I. duPont De Nemours and Co., Intervenor-Appellee.
No. 86-877.
United States Court of Appeals,
Federal Circuit.
Dec. 22, 1986.
Denis McInerney, Cahill Gordon & Reindel, of New York City, argued for appellants. With him on the brief were David R. Hyde, Laurence T. Sorkin, George Wailand and P. Kevin Castel. C. Frederick Leydig, Leydig, Voit & Mayer, LTD., of…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n v. Board of Regents of the University of OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- N v. Akzo, Aramide Maatschappij V.O.F., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Rockwell International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997