Senate Silver Mining Co. v. Hackberry Consolidated Mining Co.
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GIBBONS, Superior Judge.
This action arose out of the following statement of facts: The Haekberry *482Consolidated Mining Company and the Senate Silver Mines Company entered into a contract with the Hackberry Consolidated Silver Mines Company whereby it was agreed that the first two named companies would consolidate their holdings consisting of adjoining mining properties, situated at Hackberry, Arizona, and cause the same to he owned by the Hackberry Consolidated Silver Mines Company, a new corporation organized' for that purpose. Growing out of this agreement three actions were filed in the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Perrin v. Mallory Commission Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1904
3Cited by5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. La Prade v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1934
- State Ex Rel. Paramount Publix Corp. v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1931
- State Ex Rel. Gold Creek Mining Co. v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1935
- Acacia Mutual Life Ass'n v. BerryArizona Supreme Court · 1939
- Hackberry Consolidated Silver Mines Co. v. NeagleArizona Supreme Court · 1922