Legal Opinion

Perrin v. Mallory Commission Co.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1904No. Civil No. 848PublishedCited by 10 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District in and for the County of Coconino. R. E. Sloan, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.

On the nineteenth day of March, 1903, the Mallory Commission Company brought an action in the district court of Coconino County against E. B. Perrin to recover upon a promissory note alleged to have been executed by the defendant to the plaintiff company. For his answer to the complaint, the defendant on April 15, 1903, filed a general demurrer only. This was the state of the pleadings when the ensuing term of the district court opened, September 21, 1903. On the second day of the term, and before the trial of said cause, the defendant served upon the plaintiff, and filed with the clerk, an…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lewis v. AlexanderTexas Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Hopkins v. WrightTexas Supreme Court · 1856
  3. Wiebusch v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Garrison v. GoodaleOregon Supreme Court · 1892
  5. McLane v. PaschalTexas Supreme Court · 1884

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Baker v. MaseehArizona Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Beltran v. RollArizona Supreme Court · 1932
  3. State Ex Rel. La Prade v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Kunselman v. Southern Pacific RailroadArizona Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Boyle v. WebbArizona Supreme Court · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API