Legal Opinion

Hackberry Consolidated Silver Mines Co. v. Neagle

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1922No. Civil No. 2003Published

1Opinion of the Court

GIBBONS, Superior Judge.

The facts that give rise to this attempted appeal appear fully in case No. 2002, ante, p. 481, 211 Pac. 564, entitled Senate Silver Mining Co., a Corporation, v. Hackberry Consolidated Mining Co., a Corporation, Hackberry Consolidated Silver Mines Co., a Corporation, et al. It *489is the opinion of the court that the order of the trial court refusing to recognize attorneys Spicer, McDowell and Armour, and in their places recognizing attorneys Herndon and Dunnigan as representing defendant Hackberry Consolidated Silver Mines Company, is not before us for review. The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Senate Silver Mining Co. v. Hackberry Consolidated Mining Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API