Legal Opinion

Botany Worsted Mills v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 4, 1927No. D-747PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoss, Judge

In its tax return for the year 1917 plaintiff, Botany Worsted Mills, claimed as a deduction for compensation paid to its board of directors for the year 1917 the aggregate sum of $1,565,739.39 in addition to certain nominal salaries paid to the members of said board. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue disallowed on this item the sum of $783,-656.06, and on or about June 17, 1920, an additional assessment in the aggregate sum of $703,578.37 was made against plaintiff, which sum was paid by plaintiff on or about June 28, 1920. Of this amount $450,994.06 was attributable to the disallowance by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. Philadelphia Knitting Mills Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1921

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Botany Worsted Mills v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Boulez v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1981
  3. Charles McCandless Tile Service v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
  4. William S. Gray & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1925
  5. General Split Corporation, a Wisconsin Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API