Legal Opinion

Charles McCandless Tile Service v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 20, 1970No. 30-67PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLaeamoee, Judge

The issue presented involves the extent to which amounts paid by plaintiff during the years in question to its two principal officer-stockholders are deductible for tax purposes as reasonable compensation. The relevant facts, set forth at length in succeeding findings, are recited here in summary fashion.

Plaintiff, Charles McCandless Tile Service, is a corporation organized, existing, and doing business under the laws of the State of California. Its business is that of ceramic tile contracting, and its primary area of activity is southern California. Plaintiff’s present business is the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Botany Worsted Mills v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Klamath Medical Service Bureau v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
  3. Shield Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1943
  4. Irby Construction Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
  5. Twin City Tile & M. Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Paula Constr. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1972
  2. Laure v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1978
  3. A. C. Ball Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  4. Hudlow v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1971
  5. Giles Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API