Legal Opinion

Goff v. Ladd

California Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1911No. S.F. No. 5304PublishedCited by 10 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

When this case was in Department it was decided upon the record then before this court that this action upon a rejected claim presented against the estate of Benjamin Healey, deceased, was not commenced within three months after its rejection and was, therefore, barred by the provisions of section 1498 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Upon petition for a rehearing and the presentation of a supplemental record it was shown that the action upon the claim was in fact commenced within the time limited by the code provision. The rehearing was therefore granted that the appeal might be…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Keller v. AshfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Hampton v. PhippsSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Williams v. NaftzgerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Osborn v. NobleMississippi Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Macklin v. Northern BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1885

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. DKN Holdings LLC v. FaerberCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Johnson v. Holmes Tuttle Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Jones v. WiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Williams v. ReedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Montgomery v. DornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API