Healey v. Anglo-Californian Bank, Ltd.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. J. C. B. Hebbard, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
Plaintiffs allege in their complaint that on November 29, 1902, they caused to be delivered to defendant irrigation district a sealed proposal in writing to do certain work for it upon its canal system, and accompanying said proposal, placed in the possession of said defendant irrigation district their check for $6,000, upon the face of which check was written “Not to be cashed unless forfeited”; that said check was certified by said defendant bank and was so delivered under an express agreement between said defendant irrigation district and plaintiff, that “if said proposal were not by said…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Fones Hardware Co. v. ErbSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
- Bolton v. GilleranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Packard v. HayesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1902
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Turlock Irrigation Dist. v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Waldteufel v. Pacific Vineyard Co.California Court of Appeal · 1907