Legal Opinion

Anne Arundel County Ethics Commission v. Dvorak

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 24, 2009No. 2714 September Term, 2007PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLANDER, Judge.

This appeal arises from a seemingly endless battle between the Anne Arundel County Ethics Commission (the “Commission”), appellant, and Phillip Scheibe, Esquire and Robert Dvorak, appellees, who are former senior level employees of Anne Arundel County (the “County”). 1 The appeal concerns appellees’ involvement, after they left County employment, in class action litigation instituted against the County by various property owners, pertaining to the County’s development impact fees. To some extent, the issues are muddled because we have two judicial trains running largely on…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. United States v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. Oakland Cannabis Buyers' CooperativeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Colandrea v. Wilde Lake Community Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  5. Anne Arundel County Board of Education v. NorvilleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gonsalves v. BingelCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  2. In Re Adoption/Guardianship of DUSTIN R.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  3. In re: Adoption/Guardianship of Dustin R.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API