United States v. Adeyemo
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS UNDER RFRA
MARTIN J. JENKINS, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Defendant Moses Adeyemo (“Defendant”) moves to dismiss the indictment under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (“RFRA”). (Docket No. 11.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Defendant’s motion to dismiss.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Defendant is a citizen of Nigeria and the United States of America. When Defendant travels to the United States, he stays for one to two months. He brings Nigerian wooden carvings and handicrafts that he gives as gifts and sells at different Bay Area flea…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Gonzales v. O Centro Espírita Beneficente União Do VegetalSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Yu Kikumura v. HurleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. HardmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. William Allan JonesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Conservation Force v. SalazarDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2009
- Conservation Force v. SalazarDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- United States v. MannehDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2008
- International Church of Foursquare Gospel v. City of San LeandroDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2012