Legal Opinion

United States v. Adeyemo

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 4, 2008No. CR 03-40220 MJJPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS UNDER RFRA

MARTIN J. JENKINS, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Defendant Moses Adeyemo (“Defendant”) moves to dismiss the indictment under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (“RFRA”). (Docket No. 11.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Defendant’s motion to dismiss.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Defendant is a citizen of Nigeria and the United States of America. When Defendant travels to the United States, he stays for one to two months. He brings Nigerian wooden carvings and handicrafts that he gives as gifts and sells at different Bay Area flea…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Gonzales v. O Centro Espírita Beneficente União Do VegetalSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Yu Kikumura v. HurleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  4. United States v. HardmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
  5. United States v. William Allan JonesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Conservation Force v. SalazarDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2009
  2. Conservation Force v. SalazarDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  3. United States v. MannehDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2008
  4. International Church of Foursquare Gospel v. City of San LeandroDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API