Legal Opinion
United States v. Hardman
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 5, 2002No. Nos. 99-4210, 00-2166 and 00-4015PublishedCited by 154 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TACHA, Chief Judge.**
*1118Appellants Raymond S. Hardman and Samuel Ray Wilgus, Jr. were convicted for unrelated counts of illegally possessing eagle feathers in violation of sections 703 and 668(a) of Title 16 of the United States Code, respectively. Appellee Joseluis Saenz had eagle feathers in his possession seized by the Bureau of Indian Affairs, but was not criminally prosecuted.1 He made a motion pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 41(e) for the return of the feathers, and the district court granted the motion. The cases initially came to three separate panels of this court. Because of the conflicting…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by154 opinions
- Bridas S.A.P.I.C. v. Government of TurkmenistanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- Hill v. KempCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Axson-Flynn v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Roman Catholic Bishop v. City of SpringfieldCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- Grace United Methodist Church v. City of CheyenneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
149 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.