Legal Opinion

Sonoma County Flood Control & Water Conservation District v. Anderson

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 9, 1955No. Civ. No. 8957PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, P. J.

Petition for writ of mandate. Petitioner, a flood control and water conservation district, asks this court to command its treasurer to sign, execute and deliver to the buyer bonds of the district in the sum of $5,598,000. Its petition shows that the Congress of the United States has *699enacted Public Law 516, 81st Congress, chapter 188, Second Session, approved by the President of the United States May 17, 1950, whereby a plan for flood control, water conservation and related purposes in the Russian River Basin in California was approved substantially in accordance with the recommendation of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. County of TulareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. McMullen v. Glenn-Colusa Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. Millott v. Association of Mare Island EmployeesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Robbins v. Sonoma County Flood Control & Water Conservation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API