Millott v. Association of Mare Island Employees
California Court of Appeal
PROCEEDING in Mandamus to compel the repurchase of certain stock. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
This is an original application to this court for a writ of mandate requiring respondent to repurchase certain stock of said corporation. An' alternative writ was issued and on the return day respondent filed a general demurrer and also an answer to the application. The contention of petitioners is grounded upon the provision in the by-laws of the association providing that “No stock shall be sold or certificates issued for less than ten shares. All stock of the Corporation is to be sold subject to the right of the Corporation to repurchase the same at any time upon paying one dollar ($1.00)…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People ex rel. Davidson v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Knowles v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Heinlen v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Santa Cruz Gap Turnpike Joint Stock Co. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Palache v. HuntCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Perry v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- McMullen v. Glenn-Colusa Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Colthurst v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Sonoma County Flood Control & Water Conservation District v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955