Legal Opinion
Big Owl v. United States
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided February 19, 1997No. Civil 94-5039PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER
BOGUE, Senior District Judge.
Pending before the Court is defendant United States of America’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(b). All briefing has been received and the matter is ripe for disposition.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Eleanor Big Owl was hired by the Porcupine Day School as a teacher for the 1992-93 school year. On August 17, 1992, Big Owl and the Porcupine School Board entered into an employment contract running from August 17, 1992 to May 28, 1993. The Staff Handbook for the Porcupine Day School addressed the subject of re-employment of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Berkovitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Tribal Court of the Spirit Lake Indian ReservationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- Allender v. ScottDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2005
- Stago v. Wide Ruins Community School, Inc.Navajo Nation Supreme Court · 2002
- Mentz v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 2005
- Anthony v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.