Legal Opinion

United States v. Pickard

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 5, 2013No. 12-3142, 12-3143PublishedCited by 104 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EBEL, Circuit Judge.

Defendants-Appellants William Pickard and Clyde Apperson appeal the district court’s décision to deny their motion to unseal the Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”)’s file on one of its confidential informants. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we conclude the district court erred in the manner in which it denied Defendants’ motion to unseal the file, for three reasons: The court 1) failed to require the United States to articulate a significant interest in continuing to keep the DEA records sealed; 2) did not apply the presumption that judicial records…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Hollingsworth v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Mann v. BoatrightCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by104 opinions

  1. Estate of Marvin L. Booker v. GomezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  2. Kile v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  3. Heraeus Kulzer, GmbH v. Biomet, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  4. McWilliams v. DinapoliCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
  5. Parson v. FarleyDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2018

99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API