Legal Opinion

State v. Palenkas

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 19, 1996No. 1 CA-CR 95-0752PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VOSS, Judge.

Edward Palenkas (“defendant”) appeals from his convictions, after a jury trial, of one count of reckless manslaughter and one count of leaving the scene of a fatal injury accident. The only issue we address in this opinion 1 is whether the prosecutor’s use of defendant’s invocation of his constitutional right to refuse a warrantless search and the fact that he contacted his attorney, as evidence of guilt, deprived him of due process and requires a new trial. Because we find that the prosecutor’s conduct, not invited by defendant, resulted in prejudicial, fundamental…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. United States v. GouveiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. United States v. HaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. State v. AtwoodArizona Supreme Court · 1992

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. PollardColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Wilson v. IHC Hospitals, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2012
  3. United States v. Fany MorenoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  4. State v. SweeneyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  5. State v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API