Legal Opinion

State v. Buell

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided January 3, 2008No. 33435PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANSING, Judge.

This appeal challenges an order denying Val J. Buell’s motion to suppress evidence of his performance of field sobriety tests. According to Buell, the evidence should be suppressed because his consent to perform the tests was coerced. We affirm.

I

FACTUAL & PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

A Coeur d’Alene police officer was in the parking lot of a bar when he observed Buell drive in, park, and lose his footing in attempting to exit his vehicle. The officer spoke to Buell, who admitted to consuming alcohol. The officer decided to detain Buell to investigate whether he had been driving under…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. Arlyn v. OrrIdaho Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. State v. LianIdaho Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. State v. SpencerCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API