Legal Opinion

Youngblood v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 2007No. 20050400PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILKINS, Associate Chief Justice:

T1 Mr. Youngblood seeks to extend the coverage of an insurance policy under the doctrine of equitable estoppel. He admits that the language of the policy does not extend coverage under these cirenmstances, but relies on representations of the scope of coverage made by the insurance agent in selling him the policy. On summary judgment, the district court held him to the language of the policy, but on appeal, the court of appeals agreed in principle and reversed on the basis of material issues of fact precluding summary judgment.

T 2 On certiorari, we have agreed…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Earl Lee and David Abramson v. Richard Burkhart and Patrick Sullivan, Connecticut General Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  2. Nunley v. Westates Casing Services, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1999
  3. First American Title Insurance Co. v. J.B. Ranch, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Davis v. DavisWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Humetrix, Inc. v. Gemplus S.C.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Salt Lake City Corp. v. Big Ditch Irrigation Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Meadow Valley Contractors, Inc. v. State Department of TransportationUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Maryland Transportation Authority Police Lodge 34 v. Maryland Transportation AuthorityCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  4. Webster v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NACourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
  5. BCC Merchant Solutions, Inc. v. Jet Pay, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2015

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API