Legal Opinion

Martin v. Lauder

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided August 5, 2010No. 20090523-CAPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

ORME, Judge:

' 1 Defendants Edwin and Cynthia Lauder and Mary Best Ferguson challenge the district court's denial of their summary judgment motion and its grant of summary judgment to plaintiffs Bruce and Diane Martin. Defendants also challenge the district court's ruling that their claim for equitable estoppel was moot. We affirm the district court's denial of Defendants' summary judgment motion but reverse the court's grant of the Martins' summary judgment motion and its ruling on Defendants' equitable estoppel claim.

12 This dispute between Defendants and the Martins arose…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Orvis v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Giusti v. Sterling Wentworth Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Cabaness v. ThomasUtah Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Ault v. HoldenUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Wycalis v. Guardian Title of UtahCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gardiner v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
  2. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC v. MiglioreCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
  3. Fisher v. DavidhizarCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011
  4. JENCO LC v. Perkins Coie LLPCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016
  5. Willey v. BugdenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API