Legal Opinion

Tudor v. HEUGEL

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 13, 1961No. 19,406PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRyan, C. J.

This was an action brought by the appellant against the appellees to recover damages resulting from an alleged breach of an implied warranty in the sale of real estate. The assignment of error is the sustaining of demurrers filed by the appellees.

The complaint alleges:

“. . . That the plaintiff made known to said defendants the particular purpose for which she required said dwelling house and real estate; As a home in which to live. That at said time and place said defendants impliedly warranted that said dwelling house was reasonably fit for the purpose for which plaintiff required it, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cagney v. CusonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Shepard v. GobenIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Steiber v. PALUMBOOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Anderson Drive-In Theatre, Inc. v. KirkpatrickIndiana Court of Appeals · 1953
  5. Hawkins v. Dorst Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Theis v. HeuerIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Thompson Farms v. CORNO FEED PRODUCTS, ETC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Old Town Development Company v. LangfordIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Staff v. Lido Dunes, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Theis v. HeuerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API